53.55% rad vs 47.88%dire
I don't know..but i think radiant's perspective had a better vision on map
56% rad vs 43% dire.
Wow I never realized I had this wide a gap between these two sides. I think radiant safelane and mid is always advantageous. Slightly easier to avoid ganks and the enemy safelane is easier to gank too.
radiant 57,14% and dire 62,32%
dire more suitable for me, because i can go safelane or nc at dire
Swaggernaut Yolonero
how you can have more than 100% total ? 57,14+62,32 thats 119,46 % m8
4head
56.45 Rad
47.33 Dire
@Purist: It's talking about your winrate. Your winrate doesn't add up to 100% (check your games). It's only supposed to average out to your global winrate.
@purist for example:
He played dire side 100times and he won about 66x so he got 66%..
Same goes for radiant ...
so its not like radiant : dire percentage
Interesting, people still wins a lot more on Rad... I think its about safelane on radiant.. Wich are the most confortable lane to be. Btw, i am even more confortable on dire. For me, the ganks setup are damn prettly easly
I noticed my stats for Faction are very skewed at them moment. for the past month my figures are:
Dire: Played 26 matches, winrate 57.69%
Radiant: Played 12 Matches, winrate 80%
low sample size i know.
Radiant: 57.84%
Dire: 49.83%
Runes are more easy to secure than on Dire since it's nearer on your cliff.
Mid lane neutrals is much nearer than on Dire. Very useful if you're tinker, meepo, alche, sf, etc.
If you play Pudge, it's more easy to hook 'upward' than 'downward'. Though it depends on people, I'm more comfortable clicking enemies on top of me.
It's also easier/safer to stack ancient neutrals than on the dire side if your a sven domi type
in the past 6 months i've won 78% on dire and 50% on radiant though the lifetime stats are pretty even
i mostly play carry and offlane
Personal thougths:
MID - rad better (near jungle creeps to farm out)
SAFE- rad better (escape situations for the carrier)
Rotating/romaing - TOTAL dire advantage (thats why my winrate is much higher on dire, i play mid and ask support rotations)
Offlane- Same situation, but its easly to offlane agasint rad. (escape situations too)
This month,
Rad-63%
Dire-34%
Last six month
Rad-60%
Dire-50%
Honestly I know the radiant jungle like the palm of my hand. For a normal skill player I even know where to put an anti tinker ward. That btw I learned playing radiant side. Dire jungle is a bit spooky for me. Radiant feels more open. Of course the farm speed is a bit low but I like radiant more. Playing radiant also gives me more confidence.
most people win more on radiant. In the past it was easy to explain why, radiant had better jungle, better ancients, easier to farm jungle as mid, better lanes. The only thing dire had over it was easier rosh access but pubs don't exploit that advantage.
Now with the new map it's much more even, radiant jungle is not nearly as good as it once was, I think dire is better, though radiant ancients still seem better and their offlane has much better access to that hard camp. So I don't really get why radiant continues to win more now but they still do.
@Dire I'm sure you're right. Most of the winrates posted here come from all the matches of a certain user. If one would back it up to say, when 6.86 was first released, I'm sure it would tell a different story.
Well my radiant win rates are still inexplicably higher. For all time my radiant is like 54% and dire like 45%, but last three months it's 56 and 52% respectively. So radiant is staying about the same, dire is going up, but still not higher. It's weird. It must just be psychological or something for pubs.
Check out my first dota video please!
Por favor, se conecte para postar comentários.
Yes guys, i win the most on time when i play on dire. Like almost 60% and not even 50% when radiant...
Let me see your best side, i play usually the same heroes on both side with this smurf... So the side interfears for me hahah