^
he just trolled u. U're not shadowbanned, it's basicly a ban which people get for trying to abuse the matchmaking system. People like Wave and Chris got shadowbanned, if they queue they get matched with other shadowbanned accounts and bots.
To ur main question:
Servers where fine to my knowledge, maybe it was a lag from ur side or maybe there was something going on which caused ur queue time to go that long.
but i'm not sh adowbanned, why the fuck are you even trying to lie at this point you obnoxious fat 12 year old?
Shadowban isn't permanent and you know it wave.
Chris was intentionally getting himself shadowbanned knowing it only lasted 24-48 hours.
it is permanent, ive seen threads about it.
i mean if you want to lie and say ive been shadow banned then gladly prove it
[IMG]http://eslgfx.net/gfx/logos/playerphotos/2772000/2772514_big.jpg[/IMG]
Pretty cute afterall. So hunk, so big
@Concede:
Chris is still shadowbanned, after what, 4 months?
@Wave: you seem pretty upset, how about you prove that you are not shadowbanned? ;3 Oh w8, you can't because it's true. Autistic Swedish cunt is sad.
@dd: thx.
@esteban:
Thats me when i was 17 years old.
-> http://www.esl.eu/eu/player/2772514/
So now you've been going to gym for several years looking hunk as fuck, amaright?
Owell, I look like you, but like a stick instead. However I have some cute chubby cheeks.
Love cuddling with them every night.
rofl, nice logic
you say he is shadowbanned, he says he is not. YOU are the one supposed to prove that he is, not the other way around. Look how ugly it looks, I am accusing you for raping my sister, prove to the court you didnt.
You can't, thats why I have to prove you DID, not you should prove you didnt, thats plain stupid
@ddsama:
No i haven't. Why would i?
Right.... You prolly weight 180KG and you have a bin and a bottle in case you can't read the toilet in time. Also we cannot forget the refrigerator next to your bed. You have prolly already been in TV a several times.
@SLEAVE:
Why do you crawl into ur buddies ass? You wanna make forum more exiting? Gud, we need more shit here anyways.
^
you seem upset kiddo? Pls tell mommy that you can stay longer, otherwise you can't post shit in late night ;3
@Blunt
what you are talking about? im just pointing out a logical flaw in your argument, you are stating something you're the one supposed to prove, not the guy who is being acused. its really simple
and yea wave has always been nice to me, he helps me when i ask him to, why wouldn't i step up for him if I see some dumb shit happening?
the same would go for havoc, zenoth, dd. those guys were very receptive to me so its kinda nice from me to be friendly to them
@wave
I couldn't care less if one of your accounts is or is not shadowbanned. You have so many I doubt having one getting shadowbanned would phase you for a moment anyway.
@ Blunt
Shadowban time increases the more you get placed in the shadowban pool.
Several players have reported their first few shadowban experiences only lasted 24 hours.
Why you make these assumptions, Blunt? You thinking negative on everything and everybody?
You probably an insecure sadboy, ain't you.. :'(|)
@Concede, according to Sampson (and by the way he states stuff he seems to know what he is talking about either way he wouldn't be so arrogant about it) shadowban is IP related so doesn't matter the account you play, you will be shadowbanned. he said that in one of my threads last month iirc
@Sleave:
He claims that he has a 6k account, yet has a problem with me not presenting my accounts. I know for a fact that he is shadowbanned, i won't give my source since it's a person mc. austistc knows. Basically i want to protect that person since he seems to be on good terms with this cunt and i don't want to ruin it for him, since wave's a stupid kid who can't think anyways.
i lol'd at 2nd reply.
@Concede:
It seems that the shadowban method is timed for the first few times but gets longer the more you abuse, basically the last stage is perm ban.
@SLEAVE: Shadowban is NOT IP related. That is the most insecure shit you could ever come up with.
@norway autistic boy:
No, but glad that you're concerned fatty ;3
@Sleave
I'm not concerned one way or another as to the status of waves account(s). That said, IP bans aren't that strong of a deterrent. It is easy for most people to change ones IP...
My point was that the first couple times a player is shadowbanned, they are let out of that pool in a relatively short period of time.
@blunt i know for a fact that you raped my sister which I don't have, prove you didnt. its the same shit dude
or you prove this or you give up about it
^
That example is extremely stupid also i know what you are trying to say, but it doesn't apply here.
it applies everywhere, whenever you state something you are the one supposed to prove that.
you said a dumb stuff to wave: "prove you're not shadowbanned".. rofl, prove me your innocence
im not arguing for him, i would say that to everyone, if you state something u prove that, simple as that
im not even saying wave wasn't shadowbanned cause i dont know, im just saying that the guy has to prove his point, only that
@Sleave:
Now you don't make any sense whatsoever. srsly read what u're posting dude, that shit is hilarious.
Also no, it doesn't apply anywhere, you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.
yea i study law and this shit is like the base of everything but probably i dont know what im talking about and you who said a stupid shit like that is the one who does, ok buddy keep it going
burden of proof, go look for it
@sleave
Dud its the internet dont you guys see that this motherfucker is a stubborn self hyped loser seeking attention? just let him talk its not like you gonna change his mind anyway
^
i see you are a poor ass child that seems to be butthurt.
@Sleave:
He who does not carry the burden of proof carries the benefit of assumption, meaning he needs no evidence to support his claim. Fulfilling the burden of proof effectively captures the benefit of assumption, passing the burden of proof off to another party.
You really are shitty at your studies.
yea so you are agreeing with me, he who does not carry the burden of proof (wave) carries the benefit of assumption, thanks dude youre really smart
^
Are you really that stupid?
or did you realize u got rekt and now try to troll poorly, either way you really look like an asshat bro ;x
^^i don know what wave carries, i carry my teammates with ES. #proES
^^
When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. An argument from ignorance occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proven true.[1][2] This has the effect of shifting the burden of proof to the person criticizing the assertion, but is not valid reasoning.[3]
i really dont knwo what u talking about mate, do you really think you did fulfill the burden by saying "i know for fact that he was shadowbanned" or did i miss something
oh dear two people claiming i am shadowbanned and when they cant prove it, they bitch out and say "i could care less"
im banned :( http://puu.sh/bc082.jpg
now post screens of your 6k smurfs you disgusting fat piece of shit
I am 6k guysss please believe mee i am saying it so you guys need to believe me
By the way i love how Sleave is totally right about this shit and he proves it with good arguments, while blunt says some ramdon insult, blunt are you even reading what he is posting ? I guess not
@Blunt
You can be normal from time to time, but you are really childish. Sometimes you look like Wave, or even worst cause at least wave doesnt post " meme " stuffs.
The truth is you want us to believe that you are 6k, because if you didnt care about our opinion you woudnt defend yourself when someone calls you out for lying, still everytime havoc or anyone says something about your lie you respond back with some ramdon insult.
@Sleave
you missed a lot.
Sleave: it applies everywhere, whenever you state something you are the one supposed to prove that.
That itself is so wrong. If i claim that 2+2 is 4 i don't need to prove it.
The next issue is, this is not a philosophic debate, hence your source is absolute bullshit. Might aswell post some proof rules for math.
The philosophical burden of proof or onus (probandi) is the obligation on a party in an epistemic dispute to provide sufficient warrant for their position.
You try to appear smart, yet you keep making urself look like an idiot. Maybe small kids might be impressed but people with a brain are just amazed how weird you are.
@autistic wave:
[IMG]http://puu.sh/bc082.jpg[/IMG]
I happen to have the exact same account HUE HUE HUE. Go ahead boy. Prove it. Stop making a screen. Post ur 6k account and a matchlink, oh you can't? poor little thing.
@Dorkly:
good, now u look like an asshat aswell. U got impressed by rules that don't apply? Poor thing.
@Sleave:
48h shadowban is for sandboxie and stuff like that
lifetime shadowban is for 'disruptive behavior', as valve calls it.
It does apply in this case how you can not see it ?
I could be a retard, i could have autism, still ALL my points are true and you know that.
"you are really childish"
"You try to appear smart, yet you keep making urself look like an idiot. Maybe small kids might be impressed but people with a brain are just amazed how weird you are."
Expected.
Anyway, everyone here knows you are a special case, or why do you think everyone are either insulting you or being sarcastic when talking to you ?
^
It doesn't. I even gave u an example. If you fail to see that, then you truly are a retard.
I think SLEAVE has some braincells and will discover why he can never make it work. He tries to talk about a specific rule which he can't put his finger on, which doesn't apply to me.
When you make a claim, you need to prove that claim, not the other way around. Please, at least read what Sleave is saying, you are just insulting and giving really fucking bad examples.
Did you even read this ?
When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. An argument from ignorance occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proven true.[1][2] This has the effect of shifting the burden of proof to the person criticizing the assertion, but is not valid reasoning.[3]
Now go ahead and insult me with some bullshit like retard autist etc, you are JUST like wave :)
dude how can this not apply to this case when you claiming he had something which he says he didn't. tell me WHY you dont carry the burden of proof in this case. please, enlighten me, what makes this case special that you dont need to prove your claim? whats that? please dont dodge, dont say anything else, just answer my question, why dont you have to carry the burden of proof in this specific case?
Por favor, se conecte para postar comentários.
is there a problem with the server ? i search like 30 min for a game :o