General Discussion

General DiscussionWhich pro are these idiots copying so badly. (Slark Blink+Bkb build)

Which pro are these idiots copying so badly. (Slark Blink+Bkb build) in General Discussion
N4

    Last 2 Slarks I've seen had this sh*t build and both lost the game...

    Treads, Aquilla, Blink, Bkb, Skadi, (refresher)

    Don't do this, for the sake of your team, don't do this...

    Starboy

      cough cough bsj

      Livin' Real Good

        BSJ isn't even that good with Slark, I don't see how he's always connected with Slark. I don't even think he's better than most of the top slarks on the leaderboards.

        ooooooooooo
          Esse comentário foi removido por um moderador
          Welt aus Eis

            bsj can outfarm burning with slark dude.

            Totentanz to The King: M ...

              Agressif did it a lot, it's also rather good if you know how to use it.

              N4

                It is good vs pushing lineup yes, when the get a lot of necro books, when you can't really utilize SB heal...

                Basically it's a build for a countered Slark, and I see people doing it with no reason, they just wanna "look" pro but dey dum as fuk doe...

                p2d

                  I can definetely remember several Slark losses where I shouldve gone blink over sb

                  Strongmind

                    Treads aquila blink bkb can`t be good in almost any scenario. Atack speed is so low right there, I mean it can be nice if its in less than 20 min. otherwise is buillshit. Anyways blink s&y do so much more even vs 1000 stuns especially in pubs. Competetive pro dota is total different thing to talk about.

                    N4

                      I actually forgot the mention the SnY in this build. Anyways it is bullshit and I agree that pro dota scene is completely different from pubs, but some people don't get this.

                      I'm aswell sick of Slarks doing PT, SB, SnY instead of PT, Silver Edge, Skadi...

                      Este comentário foi editado